Knowledge Base & Resources

Your comprehensive guide to IoT connectivity technologies and decision-making

IoT Connectivity Technologies Overview

Choose the right technology for your IoT application. Cellular protocols provide global reach through public networks, while LoRaWAN offers private network control. Click on any technology below to explore detailed characteristics and use cases.

Need Help Choosing? Read Our Comparison Guides:

Cellular IoT Protocols

Public Network Dependency

Cellular IoT primarily uses public networks managed by Mobile Network Operators (MNOs) or MVNOs.Private 4G/5G networks exist but often require infrastructure investment and technical expertise. Public cellular networks comes with provider dependency but offer global reach, SLA-backed uptime, and immediate deployment without infrastructure costs.

NB-IoT (LTE Cat-NB1/NB2)
Narrowband LPWAN for ultra-low-bandwidth, deep indoor coverage
LTE-M (Cat-M1)
Higher throughput, lower latency with mobility and voice support
LTE Cat-1bis
Single-antenna Cat-1 variant for compact, cost-effective devices
LTE Cat-1
Legacy LTE with full mobility, voice, and real-time capabilities
NB-IoT over NTN (Non-Terrestrial Networks)
Satellite extension for terrestrial cellular IoT
Private Network Focus

LoRaWAN is best suited for private networks where you control the infrastructure. While public LoRaWAN networks exist, they lack the coverage and reliability of cellular networks.Read our detailed comparison guide to understand when to choose LoRaWAN vs cellular IoT.

LoRaWAN
License-free LPWAN for private network deployments
Protocol Comparison Summary
Read Detailed Comparison
ProtocolData RateMobilityPowerVoiceCostCoveragePrimary Use Cases
NB-IoT< 250 kbpsNoBestNoVery LowDeepStatic sensors, metering
LTE-M~1 MbpsYesGoodOTTLowWideTrackers, wearables, alarms
Cat-1bis~10 MbpsYesMidYesMid-LowWideCompact trackers, smart devices
Cat-1~10 MbpsYesMidYesHigherWideVoice + data, vending, POS
LoRaWAN0.3-50 kbpsLimitedBestNoVery LowLocalAgTech, buildings, private

IoT Connectivity by Use Case

Frequently Asked Questions

What IoT connectivity technologies does the knowledge base cover?

It explains NB-IoT, LTE-M, LTE Cat-1, LoRaWAN, 4G/5G and satellite (NTN): what each is for, power, bandwidth, mobility and typical use cases. Comparison guides then help you choose between NB-IoT and LTE-M, LoRaWAN and cellular IoT, and 5G IoT and LPWAN.

How do I choose between NB-IoT and LTE-M?

NB-IoT fits static, low-data devices that need long battery life and deep indoor coverage, such as meters and sensors. LTE-M fits devices that move or need more data, such as trackers and alarms, because it supports handover and has lower latency. The comparison guide walks through the trade-offs.

When is LoRaWAN a better choice than cellular IoT?

LoRaWAN suits a private network you control: you deploy gateways, avoid per-SIM fees and keep data on your own infrastructure, within range of each gateway. Cellular IoT (NB-IoT, LTE-M) is simpler to deploy on public operator networks when you need mobility, roaming or coverage you do not want to build.

How do I get quotes after reading the guides?

Describe your need once in the requirements wizard, or browse the providers directory and country pages. Matching is free for buyers; you send one RFQ and typically receive quotes within 48 hours without contacting each provider separately.

Ready to Find Your Solution?

Browse our marketplace of IoT connectivity providers

Get personalized provider recommendations

Connectivity Audit

Measure real coverage at your sites before choosing

Expert Consultation

Speak with our IoT connectivity specialists

© 2026 IoT Connectivity Marketplace. Your trusted guide to IoT connectivity solutions.

Need Help?